Here in Yorkshire, there are two Bradfords. There are two
places co-terminous in space but miles apart in other respects (or Respects, if
you prefer) going by that name.
The first, which has been flung back into the public
imagination in recent weeks, is “Bradford the Symbol” – Bradford, the
illustration of whatever lesson the (inevitably London-based voice) you are
listening to wishes to preach.
As long as that lesson revolves around (i) decline and
stagnation or (ii) ethnic segregation, I should add.
So, we have the Bradford that proves David Cameron is out of
touch – not something that requires a great
deal of proving. We have the Bradford that proves Labour
is finished in the north of England. And of course now we have Bradford the
symbol of George Galloway’s spectacular victory/opportunism/ego (delete
as your prejudices dictate).
We have the Bradford that proves that white working class
people are awful. The Bradford that proves that poor people are all racists,
and the Bradford that proves that they aren’t as well. British
Bradford and not-British Bradford – take your pick, but just don’t come so
close that you get your hands dirty with context!
I have particularly enjoyed the colourful depictions of “Bradree”
or clan politics as if Bradford were in another world entirely.
I must confess to never having come across this myself, but
hey I live in Bradford East not Bradford West and we have a nice, cost Lib Dem
for an MP where we are. I’ve even heard we’re going to be made part of Leeds in
the Boundary Review, so how’s about that for moving up in the world? Bradford
won’t be my problem soon...
In contrast to symbolic Bradford, we have Bradford the
reality. The reality of the lives of nearly three hundred thousand people,
persistently made out to be victims or manipulated pawns with their
individuality subsumed into their “group”.
It's supposed to look like this. |
Of course, Bradford has its problems and the pictures
recently painted of symbolic Bradford are not false as such.
But they all just use
Bradford to make another point, because nobody
really wants to think about Bradford the reality for too long.
Bradford may have the national attention for the moment, but
if all we can’t rise above being just a sad example of what went wrong with (i)
the cotton industry, (ii) Thatcherism, (iii) immigration, (iv) local politics
or (v) methods of rhubarb
cultivation, then it will be long forgotten before the public has finished
picking the remnants of that pasty
out of its teeth.
Westfield is not the only gaping hole in the centre of
Bradford. The city can’t sit around waiting for London to rescue it. It’s not
going to happen,
with Galloway or without. While Bradford is a symbol of victimhood and a
byword for awfulness it’s going to remain the way it is.
Only if some dynamic local energy and motive force comes
from within this city – or any city that isn’t London – can we hope to stop the
relentless decline.
And that’s why, if you live in Bradford, you should REGISTER TO VOTE and then VOTE FOR an
elected mayor on May 3rd! Stop waiting for handouts and let’s
start solving the problems ourselves!
Right on brother, right on. [Holds a clenched fist up in solidarity]
ReplyDeleteWhen are fists not clenched?
Good point - when unclenched a fist is not a fist. But an unclenched buttock remains a buttock.
Delete