In the course of my work, I have to read and pretend to
enjoy lots of extremely tiresome articles about social media, how freakin
wonderful it is and how it can transform your business.
Apparently, it’s not enough for businesses to just sell
things any more. They have to be part of your life as well. I suppose that
stems from the Great God Google itself – which like the Christian God not only
demands that you obey It on pain of damnation, but that you love It as well.
Much more entertaining are the articles about social media
in the mainstream press – for example, this hilariously ill-informed piece from
the Daily Mail, which claims that the mass-copyright-infinging-picture-collecting-social-network-for-girls
Pinterest
is in fact named after Harold Pinter.
I’ve been trying to get back into Twitter (not under the
@RogerofSicily name, which I’ve pretty much abandoned – in spite of all the
attractive but down-on-their-luck young ladies looking for love that I’ve never
met before who have kindly decided to follow me), but it seems to me either
like shouting
into the void, standing next to some strangers having a conversation while
smiling, nodding and trying to force your way in, or just doing email in
public.
I do a bit of professional social media on Linkedin, under
my real name - which, if you learn it, gives you the power to summon and
command me (or at least to email me). But mostly I do social media on Facebook.
Which brings me on to the needlessly provocative and They Might Be Giants-referencing
headline of this post.
The social media article I am waiting for is the one that
tells you the right way to deal with connections who treat their social media
presence as a way to carry across what Members of Parliament would politely and
pompously call “saloon bar” language and attitudes into the public sphere.
There are things we might all say in private to shock, amuse
or just to be transgressive for the hell of it – which we would nevertheless
not say in public or to people we were not intimately familiar with and who we
trusted. I will not deny saying things that are offensive or awful to get a
laugh or just to be obtuse. In fact, I did such a thing last night (while
watching Crufts of all things...) and Elvira bollocked me for it, because I had
indeed crossed the line where shocking-good becomes shocking-bad.
Everyone does it but at the same time, everyone has a level
at which they too would say “that’s out of order”.
So my question is, how should you respond to social media
acquaintances who broadcast “jokes” or comments that you find offensive? They’re
not speaking directly to you – or are they? They are inviting your response.
“Unfriend them”, you will say. Done that. Is that enough though? Is it
enough to just walk away without saying anything?
You may think this is unduly pious, but as well as the standards of human interaction and mutual respect which I proclaim and attempt to uphold, I’m thinking of
my own arse here. The Great God Google and – indeed – the security services suck up
all this data (for our own good, of course).
People have lost
their jobs and even been sent
to prison for things they have said on social media. How long would it be
before my online presence became guilty by association for having sat by and “tolerated”
this?
PS – I couldn’t think of a suitable picture to go with this
post, so I followed general internet protocol and put a picture of a cute
animal on instead.
No comments:
Post a Comment